Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Does God exist?

When we wake up early in the morning, the first thing we do is thank god for granting us another day of our life. We remember different gods — Lord Shiva, Krishna, Jesus or Allah — as per our religious beliefs. 

Similarly, we see many people praying to god before having their meal. Still, there are devotees who are always in a rush to reach the religious sites. And at night, we look up in the sky and think god in the form of stars and the moon.

But who is god whom people are paying so much attention to? What does the god think about people? And why do people trust god more than themselves? These questions always come in my mind. As such I asked several people, ‘Does god exist?’ While some believed in his existence, others did not believe that god really existed. 

I was really puzzled by those answers. It was already dark and I was standing on the street and looking at the sky. There were few stars and a moon. But my eyes were full of tears and I was not able to see things 

clearly.

Just then I saw a small boy at the street looking at the sky. For a few minutes, my eyes were fixed on him. But again I looked at the sky and tried to search answers of my questions. However, I couldn’t get the answer whether god existed or not. So, I was ready to go when I saw the boy folding his hands. I rubbed my eyes to see him more clearly. His eyes were closed but he was murmuring something. Then he exclaimed with joy, “Wow! God I know you would fulfil it.”

After couple of minutes, I realised what this little soul did — he was praying to the god as he had faith in him. At the same moment I also felt that god does exists and he is within us in our soul. For me he is omnipresent and speaks in the language of my soul.

— Suvha Shree Sharma, Class IX, The Excelsior School

Two-year-old girl gets windpipe made from stem cells


AP / RSS
File photo of Hannah Warren, 2, lying in bed in a post-op room at the Children's Hospital of Illinois in Peoria, after having received a new windpipe in a landmark transplant operation on April 9, 2013.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
CHICAGO: A two-year-old girl born without a windpipe now has a new one grown from her own stem cells, the youngest patient in the world to benefit from the experimental treatment. Hannah Warren has been unable to breathe, eat, drink or swallow on her own since she was born in South Korea in 2010. Until the operation at a US hospital, she had spent her entire life in a hospital in Seoul. Doctors there told her parents there was no hope and they expected her to die.

The stem cells came from Hannah’s bone marrow, extracted with a special needle inserted into her hip bone. They were seeded in a lab onto a plastic scaffold, where it took less than a week for them to multiply and create a new windpipe.

The windpipe was implanted April 9 in a nine-hour procedure.

Early signs indicate the windpipe is working, Hannah’s doctors announced Tuesday, although she is still on a ventilator. They believe she will eventually be able to live at home and lead a normal life.

“We feel like she’s reborn,” said Hannah’s father, Darryl Warren. “They hope that she can do everything that a normal child can do but it’s going to take time. This is a brand new road that all of us are on,” he said in a telephone interview. “This is her only chance but she’s got a fantastic one and an unbelievable one.”

Warren choked up and his wife, Lee Young-mi, was teary-eyed at a hospital news conference yesterday. Hannah did not attend because she is still recovering from the surgery. She developed an infection after the operation but now is acting like a healthy 2-year-old, her doctors said.

Warren said he hopes the family can bring Hannah home for the first time in a month or so. Hannah turns three in August.

“It’s going to be amazing for us to finally be together as a family of four,” he said. The couple has an older daughter.

Only about one in 50,000 children worldwide are born with the windpipe defect. The stem-cell technique has been used to make other body parts besides windpipes and holds promise for treating other birth defects and childhood diseases, her doctors said.

The operation brought together an Italian surgeon based in Sweden who pioneered the technique, a pediatric surgeon at Children’s Hospital of Illinois who met Hannah’s family while on a business trip to South Korea, and Hannah — born to a Newfoundland man and Korean woman who married after he moved to that country to teach English.

Hannah’s parents had read about Dr Paolo Macchiarini’s success using stem-cell based tracheas but couldn’t afford to pay for the operation at his centre, the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. So Dr Mark Holterman helped the family arrange to have the procedure at his hospital, bringing in Macchiarini to lead the operation. Children’s Hospital waived the cost, likely hundreds of thousands of dollars, Holterman said.

Alliances of discomfort


Madhesi politics is undergoing a tectonic shift and the early tremors have already been felt. But many have undermined the scale of its impact. While the media reports have been rife with talks of internal homework between Mahanta Thakur’s Tarai Madhes Loktantrik Party and Upendra Yadav’s Madhesi Janadhikar Forum for a unification, there is larger development silently taking place.
Upendra Yadav’s MJF-Nepal along with Rastriya Madhes Samajwadi Party led by Sarat Singh Bhandari, M. S Thapa led Rastriya Janamukti Party and Janajati leaders like Parasuram Khapung have formed a political alliance with other fringe groups along twin agenda of identity and federalism. “We will hold a press conference tomorrow afternoon and declare the alliance.”, MJF-N’s Yogendra Yadav told Nepali Times over the phone from Jhapa district.
Yadav further said that the alliance would bring together those who have been ‘betrayed and exploited’ by the big parties including the ruling UCPN-M and the Madhesi morcha. However, when asked about unification with TMLP, he clarified, “We respect Mahantaji and want this unification to take place but we will not enter into UDMF which has failed people of Madhes and instead request TMLP to ally with us.” The young leader who is close to Upendra Yadav didn’t mince word while claiming that the idea of the unification was to establish Thakur as party’s father figure while making Yadav its political head.
The parties in alliance are holding last minute talks with Limbuwan leaders in the east as well as other Janajati leaders including UML’s Ashok Rai and Rajendra Shrestha.Whether or not the new alliance has potential to influence the future course of Nepali politics, it will once again bring back Upendra Yadav into political center-stage.
A Madhesi journalist who has been closely following these development believes, the lack of clear class or caste basis makes alliance between Thakur and Yadav unlikely.  “Besides, Upendra Yadav will not forget under what circumstances TMLP was established and how Thakur downsized his influence in Madhesi politics.”, he says.
The alliance itself is an ambitious one where parties and leaders from different orientation will be coming together with a common agenda of identity and federalism, but the biggest challenge for Yadav and his partners will be to explain to the people – how will their alliance be different from the one formed by the ruling coalition under the same tenets?
In any case, these are not electoral alliances but power consortium in which individuals and groups are looking to secure their future bargaining power amid great political uncertainties.

Clash of civilisations on Everest


The fist-fight near Camp 3 on Mt Everest on Saturday between Sherpas and three foreign climbers has been jokingly called the highest brawl in world history, but mountaineering experts say it underlines a growing problem of the commercialization of climbing in the Himalaya.
Jonathan Griffith from Britain, Ueli Steck from Switzerland and Simone Moro from Italy are noted mountaineers, who were injured when high altitude Sherpas who were fixing ropes up the Lhotse face roughed them up and damaged their tents. Steck is said to be injured and being airlifted to Kathmandu Monday.
Jonathan Griffith (r), Ueli Steck (l) on a Facebook picture on the way to Kathmandu.
Jonathan Griffith (r), Ueli Steck (l) on a Facebook picture on the way to Kathmandu.
Mountaineering experts, however, say that the incident highlights the growing clash between commercial expedition-style climbing, and free alpine style climbing on the world’s highest mountains. This year, there are more than 250 mountaineers on Mt Everest including a joint India-Nepal military expedition.
Alpine-style climbers do not use Sherpas and climb in small groups of two or three without oxygen. Griffith, Steck and Moro are the world’s most noted climbers who climb alpine-style and have done first ascents of many of the world’s most difficult faces.
Moro climbed Shisha Pangma South (8008 m) without oxygen in 27 hours in 1996, using skis in the descent from 7100 m. It was during his winter ascent of Annapurna South Face that his climbing companions Anatoli Boukreev and Dimitri Sobolev were killed in an avalanche.
Simone Moro’s Facebook profile picture.
Simone Moro’s Facebook profile picture.
Steck climbed the difficult north face of Eiger when he was 18. He has been called one of the three best alpinists in Europe by Climb magazine for his “Khumbu-express” during which he solo-climbed the north wall of Cholatse (6440 m) and the east wall of Taboche (6505 m). He was part of the daring but unsuccessful rescue bid of Spanish climber IƱaki Ochoa de Olza in 2008, who had collapsed at nearly 8000 m below the summit of Annapurna.
When climbers start punching each other on Mt Everest it is more than just “mountaineering rage”, Sunday’s incident seems to point to a clash of civilizations and two types of climbing styles, as well as between commercial expeditions and purists, that was bound to happen sooner or later.

Nepal: Kingdom in the clouds

Modern Nepal was established in the mid-18th century, when Prithvi Narayan Shah, the leader of one of the smaller principalities, conquered Kathmandu and unified many of the surrounding states. Further attempts at Nepalese expansion were halted in conflicts with Tibet, China and British India in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. 

The Shahs ruled in Nepal for much of the first half of the 19th century. That ended in 1846 in a bloody coup. Jung Bahadur, an army commander, ordered his troops to kill hundreds of Nepal's most powerful men, who had been assembled in the palace armoury. Bahadur gave himself the title "Rana" and declared himself prime minister for life. He later declared that the title would be passed down his own family line. 

The isolationist Rana regime remained in place for over a century. During that time, the royal family was reduced to figurehead status. When the British left India in 1947, the Ranas lost much of their support, leaving the door opening for an anti-Rana revolution. King Tribhuvan, a descendant of the original Shahs, left Nepal for India and, with diplomatic support from New Delhi, put the monarchy back into power. 

New government by cabinet 

In 1951, the first of Nepal's post-Rana constitutions was proclaimed. It established a multiparty system and a government of Ranas and members of the new Nepali Congress party. It also established an elected constituent assembly, but those elections were never held. The next constitution came in 1959. It established the House of Representatives and the National Assembly, but much of the governing power remained with the king. 

Three years later, another constitution established the "no party" system of government, called the panchayat, in which the prime minister, cabinet and much of the assembly were named by the king. Political parties and organizations were outlawed under the new system. In 1980, the citizens of Nepal voted against returning to a multiparty system. An amendment to the constitution shortly after the referendum allowed for direct elections to the panchayat. 


By the end of the '80s, however, a people's movement had grown strong enough to topple the panchayat system. Hundreds of people died in the ensuing conflict and King Birendra dissolved Nepal's cabinet. The Nepali Congress formed an interim government and proclaimed a new constitution, one that allowed for a multiparty, democratic system of government. 

However, even these reforms included concessions to traditional ways. The 1990 constitution did not, for example, establish a secular state as recommended by the country's left wing and non-Hindus. As well, some of the constitution's fundamental rights, such as equality of all Nepalese citizens, have not been fully implemented. 

A Maoist insurgency began in 1996 with the goal of overthrowing the constitutional monarchy and establishing a communist state in its place. At least 20,000 people have been killed in civil violence since then. 

Throne room massacre

In June 2001, Crown Prince Dipendra shot and killed 10 members of the royal family, including King Birendra and Queen Aishwarya, and then turned the gun on himself. At first, Nepalese officials called the shootings an accident and declared Dipendra king, while he was still on life support from his self-inflicted wounds. When Dipendra died, the country's State Council crowned Prince Gyandendra, the slain king's brother, the new king of Nepal. 

In June 2002, Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba dissolved parliament after a split in the ruling Nepali Congress party and called for early elections. Elections were set for November 2002, but were disrupted by the Maoist rebels. In October 2002, King Gyandendra dismissed Deuba and his cabinet for incompetence and later appointed a cabinet of his own.

Peace talks between the government and the rebels broke down in 2003 and the violence has only escalated since then.

In early 2005, King Gyanendra declared a state of emergency and dissolved Nepal's parliament. It was the second time in three years the king had taken control of the country. He accused the politicians of failing to stop the violence between the government on Maoist rebels. Gyanendra said he would form a new cabinet and restore peace and democracy within three years. 

In April 2006, a shoot-on-sight curfew was imposed in Kathmandu to stop a mass rally called by the opposition parties sidelined when King Gyanendra took over the country's administration. 

At least a dozen people were injured when Nepalese police fired on demonstrators. 

Security forces also fired on demonstrators in Pokhara killing one person and injuring at least two others. Protesters were throwing stones when the soldiers shot at them, witnesses said. 

Political parties said about 1,500 people have been detained. 

The U.S. and other Western nations urged the king to begin dialogue with Nepal's political parties, saying it is the best way to deal with both the political unrest and the Maoist rebellion. 

On May 18, 2006, Nepal's parliament voted unanimously to strip King Gyanendra of his powers and transform the kingdom into a secular constitutional monarchy.

Recent economy of nepal

Aid as % of GDP7.1%[41st of 129]
Consumer price index122.88 %Time series[66th of 165]
Economic freedom1.5[122nd of 156]
Exports to US$50,800,000.00[102nd of 224]
GDP > PPP$37,415,000,000.00[77th of 163]
GDP growth > annual %2.71 annual %Time series[129th of 187]
GDP per capita, PPP > current international $1,550.45 PPP $Time series[134th of 169]
GINI index47.17Time series[5th of 40]
Gross National Income$5,830,440,000.00[96th of 172]
Human Development Index0.526[137th of 178]
Income categoryLow income
Income distribution > Poorest 10%3.2%[31st of 114]
Income distribution > Richest 10%29.8%[63rd of 114]
Income distribution > Richest 20%44.8%[63rd of 114]
Population under $1 a day37.7[14th of 59]
Poverty > Share of all poor people0.78 % of world's poor[12th of 80]
Stock exchange
Nepal Stock Exchange
Technological achievement0.08[66th of 68]
Total reserves minus gold > current US$1,498,985,000 $Time series[92nd of 178]
Tourist arrivals by region of origin > Europe112,341Time series[107th of 195]

Highway blocked in Butwal after microbus kills 15yo

KATHMANDU: Locals barricaded the Siddhartha Highway in Butwal after a microbus fatally ran over a 15-year-old boy on Wednesday.

The victim has been identified as Bhim Thapa of Gangoliya-1, Rupandehi district. A critically injured Thapa was rushed to the Maigram-based Crimson Hospital, where he breathed his last during the course of treatment.

Police said the incident took place at around 10 a.m. 

After the microbus (Lu 1 Kha 5981), heading to Bhairahawa from Butwal, knocked down the boy, as many as 200 people gathered and blocked the traffic along the highway.

They demanded compensation to the bereaved family.

Police have taken the driver in custody and impounded the killer vehicle.

Stakeholders were holding talks to resume the highway and settle the demands regarding compensation till 1 p.m., according to police.

Roadside bomb kills 3 Brit soldiers‚ 9 Afghans

LONDON:Three British soldiers have been killed by a roadside bomb in Afghanistan, Britain's Defence Ministry said on Wednesday, in the deadliest single attack on the British military there in more than a year.

Nine Afghans were also killed in Tuesday's explosion that hit the soldiers' vehicle while it was on a routine patrol in Nahr-e Saraj district in the southern province of Helmand.

Another six British soldiers were wounded in the blast, which occurred two days after the Islamist Taliban movement launched its spring offensive, saying it would target foreign military bases and diplomatic areas.

"We have paid a very high price for the work we're doing in Afghanistan," Prime Minister David Cameron said in a morning interview on ITV television.

"It is important work because it's vital that country doesn't again become a haven for terrorists, terrorists that can threaten us here in the UK."

The three British soldiers were the first to be killed by an attack while travelling in a Mastiff, an armored vehicle designed to withstand roadside bombs and sent to Afghanistan after a debate about whether previous equipment was adequate.

"Their deaths come as a great loss to all those serving in Task Force Helmand," said Major Richard Morgan, a spokesman for the task force. Their families have been informed.

A total of 444 British soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan since Britain's military involvement there began in October 2001, including six this year.

British troops are handing over security operations to Afghan forces and are due to end combat operations in Afghanistan by the end of next year.

Yadav to register in EC despite opposing polls


THT ONLINE / FILE PHOTO
Madhesi Janaadhikar Forum Nepal Chairman Upendra Yadav (L) and CPN-Maoist Secretary Dev Gurung (R)
THT ONLINE

KATHMANDU: Madhesi Janaadhikar Forum Nepal Chairman Upendra Yadav said that he will register his party in the Election Commission (EC) citing that it is routine in a democracy.
 

However, the former deputy prime minister insisted that the new purported elections to the Constituent Assembly (CA) are not possible in the present atmosphere.

Talking with the media at an interaction organised in the Reporters’ Club, leader Yadav charged the four major political parties of deceiving the people by overly touting the November elections which, according to him, are meaningless.

Even if the polls do happen, they cannot promulgate the new constitution and only haul the nation into further crises, Yadav said. “Any polls to be held bypassing the political conflicts never can pave the way to the nation,” Yadav said.

Stating that they were not anti-election forces, the Madhesi leader urged to hold the elections only after resolving the conflicts adding “We should not forget that we are holding the CA elections but the periodic one.”

Yadav charged the UCPN-Maoist chair of not opting for federalism in the country claiming that Nepal would have already been in the Democratic Republic system if the Maoist boss had intentions for the same.

However, addressing the same function, CPN-Maoist Secretary Dev Gurung made it clear that they would protest the party registration process that has just kicked off from yesterday.

Gurung warned of the revolt if the elections would be imposed in the present circumstances typifying the elections held during the Panchayat system and former king Gyanendra’s regime.

He echoed leader Yadav about the upshots of the purported elections and said that the polls further misguide the nation.

Some 33 fringe parties led by the CPN-Maoist have already declared protest schedule including barricading the election preparations throughout the nation. 

Going, Going, Gone: Five of Asia's Most Endangered Languages


Last month, Google launched its interactive Endangered Languages Project site. The website aims to catalog and raise awareness about the world's endangered languages. Language bears centuries of cultural heritage, as well as valuable scientific, medical, and botanical knowledge, but experts believe only half of the 7,000 languages spoken today will make it to the end of the 21st century.
Of the 3,054 endangered languages documented on the site so far, nearly half are in Asia. Here's a look at some of Asia's most endangered languages and their peoples.
1. Saaroa (Taiwan)

Taiwan aborigines, Bunun tribe, Formosa [ca. 1900]. (Ralph Repo/Flickr)
Southern Taiwan is home to 300 ethnic Saaroa, only six of whom are native speakers. The Saaroa and neighboring Kanakabu (who have eight native speakers left) assimilated into the Bunun, a larger minority group. Many of Taiwan's indigenous languages have similarities with the Austronesian languages of Polynesia and Micronesia.
2. Ainu (Japan)

Japanese tourist with two Ainu in Hokkaido, date unknown. (Sgt. Steiner/Flickr)
The Ainu, often noted for how hairy they are, call Japan's northernmost prefecture of Hokkaido, famous for its ski resorts and beer, home. In 2008, 140 years after the island's annexation and 109 years after they had their nationality taken away from them, the Japanese Diet officially recognized the Ainu as an indigenous people. The Ainu language is "critically endangered," meaning the "youngest speakers are grandparents and older, and they speak the language partially and infrequently." Some sources claim there may be fewer than ten Ainu speakers today.
The Ainu traditionally practiced animism and had no written language. The Hokkaido Former Aborigines Protection Act of 1899 declared the Ainu to be Japanese people — banning the Ainu from speaking their language, practicing their religion and partaking in Ainu cultural activities. Official figures suggest that there are 24,000 Ainu living in Japan today, many of mixed ancestry, many more in denial of their roots for fear of discrimination.
3. Kusunda (Nepal)

The last of the Kusundas. (Aashish Jha/Flickr)
Earlier this year, it was reported that there is only one fluent Kusunda speaker left in the entire world. The two elderly Kusunda pictured above may be two of the last eight broken Kusunda speakers. The Kusunda people live in central Nepal and speak a language that is unlike any other in the world. Up until recently, the Kusunda were semi-nomadic hunter-gatherers. While Kusunda is one of a handful of language isolates, some theorists suggest that they migrated from Papua New Guinea.
4. Manchu (China)

"Manchu Ladies of the Palace Being Warned to Stop Smoking [ca. 1910-1925]," Beijing, China. (F. Carpenter, restoration viaRalph Repo/Flickr)
The last dynasts of Imperial China, the Manchus ruled China from 1644 to 1912. Today, there are ten million ethnic Manchus dispersed throughout China and the world, fewer than two dozen of who can speak Manchu. Many Manchus adopted Han Chinese surnames to escape persecution after theChinese Revolution of 1911 and assimilated into mainstream Chinese society.
5. Jarawa (India)

Jarawa, Andaman Islands, aken on january 5, 2007. (Christian Caron/Flickr)
The Jarawa people are the indigenous people of India's Andaman Islands. Of the 300 Jarawa, there are between six and 31 native speakers of the language. Earlier this week, India's Supreme Courtbanned all commercial and tourism activity in the area, after human rights groups criticized the government for allowing local authorities to reap financial gains from "human safaris." Along with their (sometimes cruel) curiosity, outsiders expose the Jarawa to diseases their immune systems cannot fend off. In spite of this week's ban, however, the Andaman Trunk Road, an illegal highway that runs through their jungle home, has yet to be closed. Activists fear the Jarawa will go to the way of the Bo, a neighboring people who became extinct in 2010.
Languages have been fading in and out of existence for centuries, but many of the peoples featured in this post have lost their languages because of cultural and political oppression. The Endangered Languages Project strives to celebrate and preserve the multiplicity of the world's tongues and give agency to humanity's range of lesser-known perspectives.

China's One-Child Policy Already Irrelevant?



1980s propaganda posters for the one-child policy in Guilin, China. (kattebelletje/Flickr)
Before getting pregnant with her second child, Lu Qingmin went to the family-planning office to apply for a birth permit. Officials in her husband's Hunan village where she was living turned her down, but she had the baby anyway. She may eventually be fined $1,600 — about what she makes in two months in her purchasing job at a Guangdong paint factory. "Everyone told me to hide so the family-planning people wouldn't find me, but I went around everywhere," she told me. "In the past, that place had very strict family planning, but now the policy has loosened. The cadres worry that there are too many only children here." I asked her if government policy had factored into her decision to have a second child. "It was never a consideration," she said.

For so long a symbol of the authoritarian state at its most coercive, China’s policy limiting most families to one child is slipping into irrelevance. Last week,
 the government announced it would merge the National Population and Family Planning Commission, which has overseen the policy for three decades, into the Ministry of Health — a tacit admission that limiting births no longer requires the scrutiny and enforcement it once did. Most observers see this as a first step toward dismantling a policy that has already been rendered inconsequential by increased mobility, rising wealth, and the sense that stringent controls are no longer necessary. Wealthy Chinese can travel to the United States to give birth, which also confers the bonus of American citizenship on the child. Couples one step down the economic ladder may have a second child in Hong Kong, Macau, or Singapore. Families with two offspring are commonplace among the country's millions of mobile entrepreneurs; an estimated 150 million rural migrants enjoy similar freedoms. Even in the countryside, where heavy penalties and forced abortions were more prevalent in the past, officials are loosening their grip. In my conversations with rural Chinese people over the past several years, it has become clear that fines that were once prohibitive are now just a nuisance — a couple of months' wages, rather than a lifetime of savings.Lu Qingmin, or Min, is typical of the migrant workers I met while researching a book in the factory city of Dongguan. Born in one place, working in another, and married into a third, they are as adept at moving between worlds as the frequent-flying global Ć©lite, with the difference that they have never left their home country. The Chinese government, which is good at transmitting edicts from Beijing down through the provinces to counties and villages, isn't set up for people who don't respect borders. Married migrant women are required to send home a certificate every year confirming that they are not pregnant; Min has never done this. Her older sister, who works in nearby Shenzhen, also has two children. The owner of an apartment that I rented in Dongguan from 2005 to 2006 had two children; so did a businessman who gave me a tour of the city's karaoke bars. "Most of my friends have two children, except the ones who have three children," Wu Chunming, a migrant who has lived in the city for 19 years, told me. "In the villages now, having two children is standard."
The one group that still sticks to the letter of the law are the country's traditional Ć©lite: urban residents with proper household registration, or hukou, often in government jobs, who risk punitive fines and dismissal from their jobs for violating the law. In Dongguan, the penalty for a second child in a hukou–holding family can be as high as 200,000 yuan, or $31,000; any woman with a child must have an ultrasound every three months to ensure she is not pregnant. A friend of mine in Shanghai had two abortions in the years following the birth of her daughter. "A lot of entrepreneurs, including some of my friends, have two children," she told me. "But we both work for government units, so we can't."
Officially, the policy remains the same. In 2004, a group of social scientists petitioned Beijing to relax the one-child rule, eventually allowing all families to have two children. After 30 years, they argued, the policy had lowered fertility and raised living standards; now China faced the opposite problem of an aging population with too few young people to support them. The government turned down the proposal, fearful of igniting a population explosion. In 2009, these experts tried again, this time presenting evidence that any loosening would not cause a sudden spike in births; they petitioned the government again last year. Beijing has still not approved any changes.
Yet this long-running and inconclusive debate is having unexpected results. When I visited the city of Chongqing over a year ago, a local official told me out of the blue that Beijing might soon announce a national two-child policy. "We are eagerly awaiting that," he said. In Dongguan, one person told me that anyone could have two children five years apart; another said that any resident of a major city who had a daughter could now have a second child four years later. None of these things is true. But they reflect a widespread feeling among officials and average people that draconian controls are no longer needed. "China's population is aging very fast, so there will be too many only children in the future. So the policy does not have to be as strict as before," I was informed by my migrant friend Chunming, a saleswoman for a chain of traditional-style teahouses. She is unmarried and has no need to know about family-planning policies, but she sounded as authoritative as a government spokesman.
"But they haven't formally changed the policy?" I asked her.
"No. The policy has not been formally changed," she said. Then she added, "China's laws toward births have never been that strict, that's my feeling. Different places have different policies." That was true, too. The one-child policy was born of a 1980 Communist Party directive urging Party members to "encourage" families to have one child; it was strictly enforced in large cities, where the single-child family soon became standard. But because of stiff resistance from farmers, who wanted sons to work the land and carry on the family name, provinces were granted latitude to adapt the rules as they saw fit. Some rural areas permitted couples to have a second child if the first was a girl; others allowed two children across the board. Of all the rural migrants I knew in Dongguan — all born after the policy went into effect — not one was an only child.
Chunming introduced me to Xu Xiang, a sales agent for latex manufacturers who has two daughters, aged eleven and seven. "About the only people who have one child are government officials," he told me. "For them to break this law is like for an American to violate the constitution." Yet no one he knows wants more than two children, and over two days of failed effort to meet his daughters, I began to see why. They were too busy — with math tutoring, drawing class, piano lessons, and taekwando. They attend a private school where every subject except Chinese is taught in English from the first grade. The older girl is on track to get into the best middle school in the province. She wants to go to Harvard or Oxford.
After two decades in Dongguan, Xu Xiang's hukou is still in his native Guangxi, which means that no one is monitoring the size of his family. "But what's the point of having seven fairy maidens if you can't educate them properly?" he asked me. Such sentiments explain why variable enforcement of the policy has not led to a boom in childbearing. The ideal family, of two parents feverishly pushing one or possibly two offspring to excel, has already been internalized as the norm.
Demographers estimate that a Chinese woman today will have 1.5 children on average over her lifetime, one of the lowest fertility rates in the world. In Dongguan, I met couples who skirted the law to have two children. The opposite trend is taking place elsewhere. Even couples permitted to have two children — for example, when a husband and wife are both only children — are choosing to have just one, or they are remaining childless. A study in Jiangsu province found that only ten percent of couples eligible to have a second child have had one; the rest said it would be too expensive. "People's behavior in childbearing has become diversified, along with everything else in a market economy," said Gu Baochang, a professor of demography at the Center for Population and Development Studies at the People's University in Beijing. "Some people don't want children at all. Others just strongly want to have two children. Some want more than two."
I lived in China from 1998 to 2007, and the longer I stayed, the more I felt that governance was a frantic effort to keep up with what was happening on the ground. The economic opening championed by Deng Xiaoping was actually set in motion in 1978 by a group of Anhui farmers who illegally split up their communal farmland into individual plots, which led to increased efficiency and the dismantling of the communes. In an age of reform, the government's role is often to pass laws to "legalize" entities (such as foreign Internet investors or private book publishers) that already exist. So when Beijing finally gets around to abolishing its one-child policy, as its latest actions suggest will happen, it will likely find that the ruling has almost no impact.
Min was born in 1986, six years after the one-child policy came into effect. She is the second of five children, a reflection of lax enforcement of family planning in the Hebei farming village where she grew up. (Min's father told me that one family in the village had six children; another man, who had fathered seven children, had been the village chief.) Min herself, along with everyone she knows, has two children. When history's largest social experiment in state-regulated childbearing comes to an end, it will have been borne disproportionately by the Chinese urban middle-class. The elaborate machinery built to enforce these policies barely touched Min at all. She was ignored by the government, living at the margins — in China, that's often the best place to be.

Citizenship distribution resumes after talks in Morang

BIRATNAGAR: The distribution of citizenship certificates postponed over discrimination has resumed from today. 

It was postponed following dispute on the issue at the Mobile Camp at Bhathigachh of Morang district dispatched by the District Administration Office, Biratnagar. 

It resumed after discussions among Assistant CDO Prem Luintel, Madhesi Janadhikar Forum Nepal's Radhe Kamat, Manoj Sharma and local political leaders. 

Tension had ensued over the issue at Bhathigachh on Tuesday. People and voters of Katahari, Budhanagar and Bhathigachh have also come for voters' ID today.

1 killed‚ 9 injured in fresh attacks on Myanmar Muslims

OKKAN: They slept terrified in the fields, watching their homes burn through the night. And when they returned Wednesday, nothing was left but ashen debris.

One day after hundreds of rampaging Buddhists armed with bricks stormed a clutch of Muslim villages in the closest explosion of sectarian violence yet to Myanmar's main city, Yangon, newly displaced Muslims were combing through the smoldering wasteland where their homes once stood, facing their losses and a suddenly uncertain future.

"We ran into the fields and didn't carry anything with us," Hla Myint, a 47-year-old father of eight, said of the mobs who overran his village.

Tears welling in his eyes, he added: "Now, we have nothing left."

One of the 10 people injured in the assaults died overnight, said Thet Lwin, a deputy commissioner of police for the region. He said police have so far detained 18 attackers who destroyed 157 homes and shops in Okkan and three outlying villages. Okkan is just 60 miles (95 kilometers) north of Yangon.

The unrest was the first reported since late March, when similar Buddhist-led violence swept the town of Meikthila, further north in centrally Myanmar, killing at least 43 people. It underscored the failure of reformist President Thein Sein's government to curb increasing attacks on minority Muslims in a nation struggling to emerge from half a century of oppressive military rule.

Hla Myint said that after the March violence, residents of Okkan began conducting informal security patrols to protect the village. But nothing happened for weeks and authorities told them not to worry.

"But things happened unexpectedly," he told The Associated Press. "When the crowds came, they shouted things like 'Don't defend yourselves, we will only destroy the mosque, not your homes, we won't harm you.'

"But they destroyed our houses" anyway, he said.

Around 300 police stood guard Wednesday in the area, which was quiet. The town's market was crowded, but Muslims were absent.

It was not immediately clear what would happen to the newly displaced in Okkan. Some were taking refuge in the few houses that were not razed; others simply sat under the shade of trees.

Several Muslims said didn't feel safe, but they would not leave because they feared more attacks elsewhere. They said they didn't trust the police to protect them and wondered how they would survive and get food.

On Tuesday night, they spent the night in the open, under the trees. Many could be seen late Tuesday, crouching in paddy fields and sitting along roadsides. Some, in a state of shock, wept as their houses burned and young men with buckets futilely tried to douse the flames.

Residents said as many as 400 Buddhists armed with bricks and sticks rampaged through Okkan on Tuesday afternoon. They targeted Muslim shops and ransacked two mosques; about 20 riot police were later deployed to guard one of them, a single-story structure with broken doors and smashed windows.

The worst-hit areas were three outlying villages that form part of the town. Each village contained at least 60 mostly Muslim homes; all were torched. Columns of smoke and leaping flames could be seen rising from burning homes in the villages as a team of police approached, pausing to take pictures with their cellphones.

Police gave no details on who was behind the assault. Khin Maung Than, a Muslim in Okkan, said he recognized some of the attackers but many faces were unfamiliar.

The mobs smashed his shop, stealing watches, breaking glass, and leaving overturned lamps and furniture scattered across the floor.

He said he climbed to the roof to escape and then took refuge with Buddhist neighbors who hid him. Returning to the shop that doubles as his home, he said: "I am speechless. I have never experienced such riots in my life."

The 60-year-old, who is married to a Buddhist woman, said he had heard of last month's violence in Meikhtila, but: "I didn't realize we'd face this because our town was very peaceful."

His wife, San Htay, said police in the town were quickly overwhelmed. They tried to disperse the crowds, she said, and several were injured in the mayhem.

"I can't explain how desperately sad I am now. My heart beats so fast because of fear," she told The Associated Press.

Stopping the spread of sectarian violence has proven a major challenge for Thein Sein's government since it erupted in western Rakhine state last year. Human rights groups have recently accused his administration of failing to crack down on Buddhist extremists as violence has spread closer to the economic capital, Yangon, at times overwhelming riot police who have stood by as machete-wielding crowds attacked Muslims and their property.

Muslims account for about 4 percent of the nation's roughly 60 million people, and during the long era of authoritarian rule, military governments twice drove out hundreds of thousands of Rohingya, while smaller clashes occurred elsewhere. About one third of the nation's population consists of ethnic minority groups, and most have waged wars against the government for autonomy.

Last week, Human Rights Watch issued the most comprehensive and detailed account yet of the violence in Rakhine state. The report accused authorities — including Buddhist monks, local politicians and government officials, and state security forces — of fomenting an organized campaign of "ethnic cleansing" against a Muslim minority known as the Rohingya. Hundreds of people were killed there, and some 125,000 people, mostly Muslims, remain displaced with large swathes of the state effectively segregated along sectarian lines.

On Monday, a government-appointed commission investigating the Rakhine violence issued proposals to ease tensions there — including doubling the number of security forces in the volatile region and introducing family planning programs to stem population growth among minority Muslims.

Pics emerge of 16 yo Angelina Jolie as underwear model

LONDON: The bee-stung lips, bedroom eyes and long dark locks were there from the beginning.

But these pictures of Angelina Jolie, taken when she was 16, highlight just what has changed since she became a star, reported the Daily Mail on tuesday.

Though she clearly missed out on puppy fat, the teenage Miss Jolie did have rounded hips and soft fleshy arms... and she always had that raw star quality. 

Today, they have gone the same way as those of any other A-lister - to mostly skin and bone. At the same time, interestingly, her chest size has increased.

Her unblemished skin is also a distant memory. Miss Jolie, now 37, is understood to have at least 13 tattoos decorating her body, including the geographical co-ordinates of her children's birthplaces etched on to her left shoulder.

Angelina's teens proved a tumultuous time for her - at 14, Angelina was permitted to move in her older boyfriend into her mother Marcheline Bertrand's LA home and later dropped out of acting classes at Lee Strasberg Theatre Institute.

Estranged from her father, she has since admitted to suffering bouts of depression, but went on to return to theatre studies and graduate from Beverly Hills High School.

Of that time, she has said: 'I had that problem early on when I couldn't feel a bond with another human being. Mostly it was all about trying to connect.'

While the star made her best effort to put her feminine wiles on show during the shoot, the images are positively demure compared to what was to come in the following years.

As well as a shock red carpet kiss with her brother James Haven, Angelina had a bisexual relationship with a Calvin Klein model Jenny Shimizu and famously wore a vial of her then husband Billy Bob Thorton's blood around her neck.

However in the last decade and with an Oscar under her belt for Girl Interrupted, Angelina has tamed her wild child ways, successfully transforming herself into a box-office star, UN goodwill ambassador and mother of six. 

Angelina has three adopted children, Maddox, Pax Thien, Zahara and biological children Shiloh, Knox and Vivienne. 

The 37-year-old recently revealed that despite world wide interest in her and Pitt, her children just see them as very ordinary parents.

She said: 'I think our kids will look back on all that as being really funny when they get older, because they think of us as being really dorky - in fact, the dorkiest people on the planet!'